Single Malt Whisky – Does Age Really Matter?

One inquiry that surfaces as often as possible about single malt whisky is this one: does the age of the whisky matter? You will see whiskies that are 18-, 25-years of age, and surprisingly more seasoned being sold and generally the more established the whisky then the more costly it is. Be that as it may, is it better? Balvenie 12 Doublewood Hong Kong

You can be sure around 2 things. First and foremost – more seasoned whiskies are extremely uncommon and besides they are pricey. Take

The Balvenie's Brand Ambassador James Cordiner explains whisky and cheese  pairing

for instance the mixed Scotch whisky Johnnie Walker Blue Label, it has whiskies in the mix that are around 50 years of age and will hamper you around $300. There are various purposes behind why more seasoned single malt whiskies are more costly. Most importantly – the more drawn out a whisky develops in the oak container, the a greater amount of it is lost vanishing. Most refineries in Scotland lose around 2% of the volume. So 2% consistently for, say 25 years is a great deal of whisky.

At that point obviously you need to take into account the time factor. 25 years is quite a while to stand by until you bottle the item. At some point the whisky will be developed in various container to impact the flavor. So this time, persistence and skill all adds to the cost.

There are fundamentally two ways of thinking in the whisky business – “age matters” and “no, age doesn’t make any difference”. The vast majority of the bigger whisky makers will showcase a particular scope of brands are different age focuses – 10, 12, 15 and 18 years of age, and will frequently give these a particular name also. For instance there is a Bowmore 12-yr old called Enigma and a 15-yr old Glenfiddich called Solera.

For instance the Chivas Brothers whisky organization are going back and forth that ‘age matters’. They market their items explicitly on this. Their slogan is: “Search for the number… an assurance old enough and quality”.

On the ‘age doesn’t make any difference’ side of the fence is, for instance, Macallan. They have begun to eliminate the age detail on a portion of their more youthful single malts and giving them names. The reality of the situation will become obvious eventually if this showcasing thought pays off. They say that they are doing this to oblige various profiles and tastes, as opposed to simply placing the single malts during a time section.

So to address the inquiry – does age matter? The appropriate response is certainly indeed, however just to do with cost. Improves? No one but you can conclude that question.

More established whiskies are absolutely more intricate and have more profundity than their more youthful partners. This is to do with the dissipation interaction (like in the event that you are cooking and you continue to stew a sauce – you will be left with a thicker and more exceptional flavor). Additionally the additional time the whisky spends in the barrel then the more it attracts the flavors from the cast.

Assuming you like solid tasting peaty whiskies, you presumably won’t track down this in a solitary malts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *